Poverty

Poverty covers four opposite realities — destitution to be fought, poverty of condition, freely chosen evangelical poverty and blessed poverty of heart. In social doctrine, the poor person is the object of a 'preferential love': the preferential option for the poor, in which the Church recognizes the face of Christ.

Ignispedia

Poverty is not, for the Church, a mere economic problem to be solved, nor one theme among others in social life: it is a place where Christ lets himself be recognized, and the poor person is the object of a "preferential love" which, according to the Catechism, has accompanied the Church "from the beginning"[1]. That is why concern for the poor runs through the whole of social doctrine, from the prophets of Israel to Evangelii Gaudium, under the now-classic name of the "preferential option for the poor."

But the word poverty is a trap: it covers opposite realities. There is the destitution that crushes and must be fought; there is poverty of condition, the simple sobriety of a life without superfluity; there is evangelical poverty freely embraced out of love for Christ; and there is poverty of heart, which the Beatitudes proclaim blessed. Confusing these meanings leads to the worst misunderstandings — either canonizing destitution as though it were holy, or despising the real poor person in the name of a disembodied spirituality. This article distinguishes these meanings, then treats poverty as a theme of social doctrine: the gaze of Scripture and the Fathers, the birth and exact meaning of the preferential option, the link between destitution, justice and "structures of sin," and finally the spiritual depth of the poor person as the face of Christ.

Several neighbouring aspects have their own article, to which reference is made without duplicating them: evangelical poverty as counsel and spiritual path, what the saints say about it and the frequent misconceptions concerning it; the universal destination of goods and private property; solidarity, the just wage, the common good and the dignity of the human person.

Which Poverty Are We Talking About? One Word, Four Realities

The four meanings of the word poverty: a single term designates realities that must be carefully distinguished. Original Ignispedia infographic created with AI.

The first mistake, when speaking of poverty, is to believe we are speaking of a single thing. The English language uses one word where the spiritual and social tradition carefully distinguishes several realities, some of which are evils to be abolished and others goods to be sought. Without this distinction, the whole discourse of the Church becomes incomprehensible: she is made to say both that poverty must be vanquished and that it must be loved, which seems contradictory until one sees that it is not the same poverty.

Destitution: an evil to be fought

Destitution — deprivation of the goods necessary for a dignified life: bread, shelter, care, work, education, security — is never presented by the Church as a good. It is an evil, a consequence of the sin of the world, which disfigures the image of God in man. The Catechism speaks of "human misery in its multiple forms" — "material deprivation, unjust oppression, physical and psychological illness and death" — as "a manifest sign of the inherited condition of frailty in which man finds himself since original sin"[2]. Far from sacralizing it, the Church affirms that she has "constantly worked to relieve, defend and free" those it crushes[3].

"Such an economy kills. How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses two points?" — Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, no. 53[4]

Fighting destitution is therefore not a facultative option, nor a mere political programme: it is a demand of the Gospel. That is why the Church has covered the world with hospitals, orphanages, soup kitchens and works of charity, and why she judges severely any social organization that deliberately produces or tolerates destitution.

Poverty of condition: the sobriety of ordinary life

Distinct from destitution, there is poverty of condition: the modest life, without luxury or superfluity, which was and remains that of most men. It is not in itself an evil — Christ himself chose it, born in a stable and living by the work of his hands. A sober life, free from superfluity, can even be favourable ground for the interior life. The danger appears only when this poverty of condition tips over into destitution, that is, when what is necessary is lacking. The Church does not demand absolute material equality, but that no one lack what is necessary and that all have access to the goods required by their dignity.

Evangelical poverty: a lack freely chosen out of love

Evangelical poverty is of quite another order: it is not a suffered lack, but a stripping freely chosen out of love for Christ, even to the vow of poverty in religious life. It is the object of its own article — How to Grow in Evangelical Poverty — to which reference is made for its meaning, its degrees and its practice. Note here only the fruitful paradox: the one who chooses poverty out of love often becomes the most ardent defender of those who suffer it. Francis of Assisi, stripped of everything, embraces the leper; Vincent de Paul, free from riches, organizes relief for galley slaves and abandoned children. Poverty chosen sets free to serve poverty suffered.

Poverty of heart: the beatitude

Finally, poverty of heart — "poverty in spirit" — is the interior disposition of the one who places his security not in goods, but in God alone. It is this that the first Beatitude proclaims blessed:

"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." — Gospel according to Saint Matthew 5:3[5]

This poverty of heart can dwell in a detached rich man, just as a resentful poor man may lack it entirely: it is a matter of the interior relationship to goods, not of a bank balance. For its practical path, see How to Grow in Detachment.

Meaning of the word "poverty"What it isValueThe Church's response
DestitutionDeprivation of what is necessary (hunger, homelessness, exclusion)An evil to be abolishedJustice and charity: relieve, defend, free
Poverty of conditionA sober life, without superfluityNeutral, even favourableEnsure it does not sink into destitution
Evangelical povertyStripping freely chosen out of loveA good, a counselAdmire, encourage, protect (consecrated life)
Poverty of heartInterior detachment, security in GodA beatitudePropose to all, rich and poor

"Blessed are you who are poor": avoiding the misunderstanding

A trap of interpretation lurks here. Saint Luke writes: "Blessed are you who are poor"[6], while Saint Matthew specifies: "Blessed are the poor in heart"[7]. Should we conclude that destitution itself confers blessedness, or on the contrary that only a disembodied spiritual disposition counts? Neither. The Catholic tradition holds the two verses together: the real, concrete poor person is loved by God and the privileged recipient of the Gospel (Luke); but what saves is not material deprivation as such — it is the poverty of heart that opens itself to God (Matthew). The poor person is blessed not because he lacks bread — God wills that he lack nothing necessary — but because his poverty inclines him to expect everything from God. Despising the real poor person in the name of "poverty in spirit," or sacralizing destitution in the name of the beatitude, are two symmetrical betrayals of the Gospel.

Scripture's Gaze Upon the Poor

Gustave Doré, 'Lazarus and the Rich Man,' engraving published in 1874. Wikimedia Commons / Polona, public domain.
The poor at the heart of Scripture: from the Law to Christ recognized in the least. Original Ignispedia infographic created with AI.

Attention to the poor is no modern invention, nor a political fashion: it is written into the heart of Revelation, from the Law of Moses to the Gospels. The God of the Bible constantly presents himself as the defender of the weak against the strong.

The Old Testament: God the defender of the oppressed

From the Law onward, Israel receives the command to protect "the widow, the orphan and the stranger" — the three figures of the defenceless — and not to exploit the poor. The Law institutes gleaning (leaving the poor what remains after the harvest), the sabbatical year and the jubilee (remission of debts, freeing of slaves, restitution of lands), which inscribe in Israel's social structure a regular mechanism against lasting impoverishment[8]. The prophets — Amos, Isaiah, Jeremiah — make the treatment of the poor the very criterion of fidelity to God: worship accompanied by injustice toward the poor is abhorrent to the Lord[9]. From this soil grows the figure of the anawim, the "poor of Yahweh": those who, stripped of all human support, expect their salvation from God alone — Mary, in the Magnificat, is their accomplished voice.

The poor Christ and the Gospel proclaimed to the poor

Christ inaugurates his mission in the synagogue of Nazareth by applying to himself the prophecy of Isaiah:

"The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring glad tidings to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free." — Gospel according to Saint Luke 4:18[10]

He himself chose poverty: he is born in a manger, has "nowhere to rest his head" (Mt 8:20), and dies stripped of his garments. Saint Paul draws from this the law of giving: Christ, "though he was rich, became poor," so that we might become rich through his poverty[11]. The Catechism sums up: the Church's love for the poor "is inspired by the Gospel of the Beatitudes, by the poverty of Jesus and by his attention to the poor"[12].

The Last Judgment: the poor person, criterion of salvation

Nowhere is the bond between the poor person and Christ more radical than in the discourse on the Last Judgment. The elect and the damned are separated on a single criterion: what they did, or failed to do, for the least.

"Whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me." — Gospel according to Saint Matthew 25:40[13]

This verse is the foundation of the whole doctrine of love for the poor: the poor person is not merely an object of pity, he is the sacrament of Christ, his hidden presence. It is "by what they have done for the poor that Jesus Christ will recognize his elect"[14].

Lazarus and the rich man: the blindness of abundance

The parable of Lazarus (Lk 16:19-31) stages not a cruel rich man, but a distracted one: he does not mistreat Lazarus, he does not see him. The poor man lies at his gate, covered with sores[15], and abundance has made the rich man blind. The reversal is striking: in the Gospel, the poor man has a name — Lazarus — and the rich man remains anonymous. In God's eyes, it is the despised poor man who has an eternal identity. The parable warns that the sin against the poor is often a sin of omission: not what is done to him, but what is not seen.

"You will always have the poor with you": neither fatalism nor alibi

One saying of Christ is often twisted into an alibi: "You will always have the poor with you, but you will not always have me"[16]. People sometimes draw from it a convenient fatalism: what is the use of struggling — poverty is inevitable. That is a misunderstanding. Christ is quoting Deuteronomy here, where the same observation — "the needy will never be wanting in the land" — leads at once to a command: "open your hand generously to your brother when he is poor and needy in your land"[17]. The permanence of the poor is not an excuse for inaction; it is the guarantee of a permanent occasion to love. As long as there are poor, there will be a place where Christ can be served.

Love for the Poor in the Tradition of the Church

Saint Vincent de Paul presents the first Daughters of Charity to Anne of Austria, painting by Brother André, 18th century. Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

Love for the poor "is part of the Church's constant tradition"[18]. Far from being a novelty of the twentieth century, it is rooted in the Fathers, the deacons of the first centuries and the immense cohort of the saints of charity.

The Fathers: justice before charity

The Fathers of the Church speak of goods in language of a vigour often forgotten. For them, giving to the poor is not first generosity — it is restitution. Saint John Chrysostom says it bluntly:

"Not to enable the poor to share in our goods is to steal from them and deprive them of life. The goods we possess are not ours, but theirs." — Saint John Chrysostom, quoted by the Catechism, § 2446[19]

Saint Gregory the Great concurs: "When we give necessaries to the indigent, we do not bestow upon them our goods; we return to them what is theirs. We are paying a debt of justice rather than fulfilling a work of charity."[20] Saint Ambrose and Saint Basil speak the same language about the superfluous owed to the poor. This patristic foundation — which belongs properly to the universal destination of goods — grounds a truth that social doctrine will repeat: justice must first be satisfied before offering as charity what is already owed[21].

The deacons and "the treasures of the Church"

From the Acts of the Apostles onward, the service of the poor (the "serving of tables") is so essential that the first seven deacons are instituted for it (Acts 6). Three centuries later, the archdeacon Saint Lawrence († 258), ordered by the prefect of Rome to hand over the "treasures of the Church," gathers the poor, the infirm and the crippled and declares: "Here are the treasures of the Church." Tradition sees in this gesture the purest expression of the Christian conviction: the true wealth of the Church is her poor[22].

The saints of charity

Down the centuries, founders and saints organized relief for the poor on an unheard-of scale: Saint Basil and his Basiliad (one of the first great hospital complexes); Saint John of God and the Brothers Hospitallers; Saint Camillus de Lellis beside the sick; Saint Vincent de Paul († 1660), "apostle of charity," organizing the Confraternities, the Daughters of Charity, relief for the Foundlings and the galley slaves; Saint Jeanne Jugan and the Little Sisters of the Poor; Saint Teresa of Calcutta († 1997) gathering the dying in the streets of Calcutta so that they might die surrounded by love and care, with dignity. This living history of organized charity gives flesh to what doctrine then states in principles — the detail of which is found in the article The Charity of the Church.

Poverty in Social Doctrine: the Preferential Option for the Poor

The great milestones of the preferential option for the poor, from Medellín to Pope Francis. Original Ignispedia infographic created with AI.

Modern social doctrine has given this millennial heritage a name and a precise formulation: the preferential option for the poor. The expression is recent, but it merely names an evangelical constant.

The birth of an expression

The formula was born in Latin America. The conference of the Latin American episcopate (CELAM) at Medellín (1968) calls the Church to give "effective preference to the poorest sectors"; it is at Puebla (1979), in the presence of John Paul II, that the formula "preferential option for the poor" is consecrated[23]. John Paul II takes it up, purifies it of every ideological reading and integrates it into the universal magisterium, notably in Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (1987). It is thus an expression born of a concrete pastoral terrain, then assumed and clarified by the central magisterium — a movement comparable to that experienced by the word "solidarity".

The exact meaning: a priority in charity, not an ideology

The risk, with such a formula, was twofold: either to dilute it into a slogan, or to harden it into class struggle. John Paul II gave the reference definition, which rules out both deviations:

"This is an option, or a special form of priority in the exercise of the Christian charity, to which the whole tradition of the Church bears witness." — Saint John Paul II, Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, no. 42[24]

Three clarifications are decisive. First, it is an option, not an exclusion: to love the poor preferentially does not mean hating the rich, but recognizing that the most destitute has an urgency that charity cannot ignore. Second, it is a priority in charity, not a partisan programme: it identifies with no party, no revolution. Finally, "the whole tradition of the Church" bears witness to it: it is not a concession to the spirit of the age, but the making-explicit of the Gospel itself.

The Catechism: preferential love

The Catechism devotes an entire section to "love for the poor" (§§ 2443-2449). There it roots the preferential option in Christ's compassion for misery:

"Human misery […] attracted the compassion of Christ the Saviour who undertook it and identified himself with the 'least of his brethren.' That is why those crushed by it are the object of a preferential love on the part of the Church." — Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2448[25]

The Catechism at once specifies the concrete demands: the corporal works of mercy (feeding, clothing, sheltering, visiting), the duty of almsgiving, and the warning against "the immoderate love of riches or their selfish use"[26].

The Compendium: a solicitude flowing from the destination of goods

The Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church (2004) attaches the preferential option to the principle of the universal destination of goods: "The principle of the universal destination of goods requires a particular solicitude for the poor, for those in conditions of marginality."[27] The option for the poor is presented there as a "special form of priority" in the exercise of charity, which "concerns the life of every Christian" and extends to the "new forms of poverty" — solitude, drugs, loss of meaning — as much as to material poverty[28].

Pope Francis: a "theological category" and a "poor Church for the poor"

Pope Francis has given this theme a new intensity. In Evangelii Gaudium (2013), he affirms the indissoluble bond of faith and the poor — "the poor are the privileged recipients of the Gospel"[29] — and he drives the preferential option to its supernatural root:

"For the Church, the option for the poor is a theological category before it is cultural, sociological, political or philosophical. […] That is why I want a Church which is poor and for the poor. They have much to teach us." — Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, no. 198[30]

The option for the poor is therefore not, in Catholic thought, a sociological posture: it is theological, because in the poor person it is "a reflection of Jesus Christ" that gives itself to be recognized. The poor person is not only the one helped; he is also the one who evangelizes, through whom God communicates "a mysterious wisdom."

MilestoneDateContribution on poverty
Rerum Novarum (Leo XIII)1891The State must have "special care" for the weak and the indigent[31]
Mater et Magistra (John XXIII)1961Development must benefit all; the rich/poor gap to be narrowed
Medellín Conference (CELAM)1968Effective preference for "the poorest sectors"
Octogesima Adveniens (Paul VI)1971"Preferential option" in germ; call to action for justice[32]
Puebla Conference (CELAM)1979Consecration of the formula "preferential option for the poor"
Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (John Paul II)1987Reference magisterial definition (no. 42); "structures of sin"
Catechism of the Catholic Church1992"Love for the poor" (§§ 2443-2449); "preferential love"
Compendium of Social Doctrine2004Synthesis (§§ 182-184) attached to the universal destination of goods
Evangelii Gaudium (Francis)2013Option for the poor as a "theological category"; "a poor Church for the poor"

The Catholic compass: neither Marxist-tinged liberation theology nor sociological reduction

The preferential option was, in the twentieth century, the object of a battle of interpretation. A certain liberation theology sought to read it through the Marxist grid of class struggle, making the poor a "class" in struggle and the Gospel a revolutionary programme. The magisterium answered clearly: the two Instructions of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Libertatis Nuntius (1984) and Libertatis Conscientia (1986), saluted the authentic concern for the poor while condemning the borrowing of "concepts borrowed from various currents of Marxist thought"[33]. The option for the poor is neither an ideology of combat nor, conversely, a mere humanitarian cause emptied of God. It is theological and spiritual before being social: the poor is loved because Christ is seen in him, and it is this charity — not hatred of the rich — that also transforms unjust structures.

Destitution, Justice and "Structures of Sin"

Justice before charity: rendering what is owed, then giving beyond what is owed. Original Ignispedia infographic created with AI.

Love for the poor is not reduced to the individual relief of destitution; it also questions the structures that produce it. On this point, social doctrine holds together two demands wrongly opposed: charity and justice.

The cry of the poor and the duty of justice

Almsgiving relieves present destitution, but it does not suffice if the social organization itself manufactures poor people. The Catechism, quoting the Council, warns: "The demands of justice must be satisfied first, lest as a gift of charity one offers what is already due in justice."[34] In other words, one cannot salve one's conscience with a few donations while maintaining an unjust wage or depriving workers of their rights. Charity is the soul of justice, but it does not replace it.

"Structures of sin"

From personal sin to the mechanisms that reproduce destitution: the cycle is broken by the conversion of hearts and the reform of structures. Original Ignispedia infographic created with AI.

John Paul II forged, in Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, the notion of "structures of sin": economic, political and cultural mechanisms which, born of personal sins (the "exclusive desire for profit" and the "thirst for power"), end up taking root and producing destitution almost automatically, "conditioning men's conduct"[35]. This notion is precious because it avoids two symmetrical errors: believing that poverty has only individual causes (the poor need only work), or believing that it has only structural causes (changing the system would suffice). The sin of the world is personal AND structural; and structures are reformed only by also converting hearts.

The new forms of poverty

The new forms of poverty are not measured only in income — without ever forgetting deprivation of what is necessary. Original Ignispedia infographic created with AI.

Poverty is not measured only in income. The Compendium and recent popes insist on the "new forms of poverty": the solitude of the elderly, exclusion, loss of meaning, addictions, the uprooting of migrants, the affective and spiritual precariousness of affluent societies. "The human being is considered as a consumer good, which can be used and then thrown away," denounces Francis, speaking of the "throwaway culture"[36]. A society can be materially rich and spiritually destitute. The option for the poor therefore also concerns these invisible forms of destitution — without ever forgetting, the Church warns, that material destitution remains the first scandal to be fought.

Poverty, a Theological Place: Christ in the Poor

Seeing, serving and receiving: Christ lets himself be met in the poor. Original Ignispedia infographic created with AI.

All that precedes culminates in an affirmation that sociology cannot make and that only faith dares: the poor person is a theological place, that is, a place where God reveals himself. This is not a pious metaphor, but the direct consequence of Matthew 25.

Recognizing the face of Christ

Serving the poor is not only doing good: it is meeting Christ. The great mystical tradition of charity — from Saint Martin sharing his cloak with a beggar who reveals himself to be Christ, to Mother Teresa seeing in each dying person "Jesus under the distressing disguise of the poor" — rests entirely on this identification. That is why the Church refuses to reduce service of the poor to philanthropy: philanthropy helps a fellow human; Christian charity adores the hidden Christ in the least.

Evangelizing and letting oneself be evangelized by the poor

The poor person is not only the recipient of the Gospel; he is also, mysteriously, its teacher. "They have much to teach us," writes Francis[37]. The poor person, stripped of human securities, teaches the rich the truth of his own fragility, the urgency of what is essential, and the blessedness of possessing nothing that does not come from God. It is in this sense that the option for the poor does not impoverish the Church: it evangelizes her. A Church that moves away from the poor moves away from Christ; a Church that serves them lets herself be converted by them.

From almsgiving to the conversion of gaze

The concrete response to poverty remains, for every Christian, the range of the works of mercy and the practice of almsgiving — not as a gesture of superiority, but as a restitution and an encounter. For the practical path of giving, see How to Grow in Almsgiving; for the overall doctrine on money and riches, see What Does the Church Say About Money?. The essential thing is not only to give, but to convert one's gaze: to stop, like the rich man of the parable, failing to see Lazarus at one's gate.

Poverty and Life in the Divine Will

The spirituality of the Divine Will transmitted to Luisa Piccarreta (1865-1947) casts an interior light on love for the poor. To live in the divine Will is to enter into the very gaze of Christ, who never sees a poor person as a stranger but as a brother to be served and a face to be loved. The soul living in the Fiat possesses nothing more "as its own": it receives everything as a gift from the Father and uses goods only as a trust for the good of all. The deepest root of love for the poor is therefore not only the duty of justice, nor even compassion, but communion: in the divine Will, the good of one is the good of all, and no one can enrich himself while his brother lacks what is necessary, for they are one in the single Will of God. Jesus says it to Luisa in these terms:

"Thus, she who lives in Our Will does everything, embraces everyone and gives Us everything." — Jesus to Luisa Piccarreta, The Book of Heaven, vol. 36, 6 August 1938[38]

This is the interior fulfilment of what social doctrine calls, in the order of structures, the preferential option for the poor: no longer merely preferring the poor, but being one with him in the Heart of Christ.

To Go Further

Notes and References

  1. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2448: "In its various forms — material deprivation, unjust oppression, physical and psychological illness and death — human misery is the obvious sign of the inherited condition of frailty and need for salvation in which man finds himself as a consequence of original sin. This is why it attracted the compassion of Christ the Saviour who willingly took it upon himself and identified himself with the 'least of his brethren.'" Official English edition; the French article quotes the official French edition (Mame/Plon, 1992).

    1 2
  2. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2448 (continued): those crushed by misery "are the object of a preferential love on the part of the Church which, in spite of the failings of many of her members, has not ceased to work to relieve, defend and free them."

    3
  3. Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, 24 November 2013, no. 53: "Such an economy kills." Official French text, vatican.va.

    4
  4. Gospel according to Saint Matthew 5:3, official liturgical translation (AELF): "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."

    5 7
  5. Gospel according to Saint Luke 6:20, official liturgical translation (AELF): "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God."

    6
  6. On the legislative protection of the poor in the Old Testament: gleaning (Lev 19:9-10; Deut 24:19-21), the sabbatical year and the remission of debts every seven years (Deut 15:1-11), the jubilee (Lev 25).

    8
  7. On worship emptied of justice, a classic theme of prophetic preaching: Amos 5:21-24 ("I hate, I despise your feasts […] But let justice roll down like waters"); Isaiah 1:11-17 ("Cease to do evil […] seek justice"); Jeremiah 22:13-16 (doing justice to the poor and needy — "is not this to know me?"). The treatment of the poor is there the criterion of fidelity to the Covenant.

    9
  8. Gospel according to Saint Luke 4:18, official liturgical translation (AELF): "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring glad tidings to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free." Quotation of Isaiah 61:1-2.

    10
  9. Second Letter of Saint Paul to the Corinthians 8:9, official liturgical translation (AELF): "For you know the gracious act of our Lord Jesus Christ, that for your sake he became poor although he was rich, so that by his poverty you might become rich."

    11
  10. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2444: "The Church's love for the poor […] is a part of her constant tradition (cf. CA 57). It is inspired by the Gospel of the Beatitudes (cf. Lk 6:20-22), by the poverty of Jesus (cf. Mt 8:20) and by his attention to the poor (cf. Mk 12:41-44)."

    12
  11. Gospel according to Saint Matthew 25:40, official liturgical translation (AELF): "Whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me." Discourse on the Last Judgment (Mt 25:31-46).

    13
  12. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2443: "It is by what they have done for the poor that Jesus Christ will recognize his elect (cf. Mt 25:31-36). When 'the poor have the good news preached to them' (Mt 11:5; cf. Lk 4:18), it is the sign of Christ's presence."

    14
  13. Gospel according to Saint Luke 16:19-20, official liturgical translation (AELF): "There was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen and dined sumptuously each day. And lying at his door was a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores." Parable of Lazarus and the rich man (Lk 16:19-31).

    15
  14. Gospel according to Saint Matthew 26:11, official liturgical translation (AELF): "You will always have the poor with you, but you will not always have me." Parallel in Mk 14:7 and Jn 12:8.

    16
  15. Deuteronomy 15:11, official liturgical translation (AELF): "The needy will never be wanting in the land. That is why I command you: open your hand generously to your brother when he is poor and needy in your land." Verse set within the legislation of the sabbatical year and the remission of debts (Deut 15:1-11). Christ quotes it in Mt 26:11; it grounds the duty, not fatalism.

    17
  16. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2444, quoting Saint John Paul II, Centesimus Annus (1991), no. 57: "The Church's love for the poor […] is a part of her constant tradition."

    18
  17. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2446, quoting Saint John Chrysostom, Homily on Lazarus, 1, 6 (PG 48, 992D): "Not to enable the poor to share in our goods is to steal from them and deprive them of life. The goods we possess are not ours, but theirs."

    19
  18. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2446, quoting Saint Gregory the Great, Regula pastoralis, 3, 21: "When we give necessaries to the indigent, we do not bestow upon them our goods; we return to them what is theirs. We are paying a debt of justice rather than fulfilling a work of charity."

    20
  19. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2446, quoting the conciliar decree Apostolicam Actuositatem (Vatican II), no. 8: "The demands of justice must be satisfied first, lest as a gift of charity one offers what is already due in justice."

    21 34
  20. On Saint Lawrence († 258), deacon of Rome under Pope Saint Sixtus II, ordered to hand over the treasures of the Church: presenting the poor he had gathered, he declares them to be the true treasures of the Church. Episode reported by Saint Ambrose of Milan, De officiis ministrorum, book II, ch. 28, who comments: "What more precious treasures does Jesus possess than those in whom he loves to show himself?" Account from the ancient hagiographical tradition; the narrative details (exact dialogue, three-day delay) vary according to the transmitted versions.

    22
  21. On the origin of the formula: the Second General Conference of the Latin American episcopate (CELAM), held at Medellín (Colombia) in 1968, already calls for effective priority for the poorest sectors. It is the Third Conference, held at Puebla (Mexico) in 1979 in the presence of John Paul II, that consecrates for the first time the explicit expression "opción preferencial por los pobres" — "preferential option for the poor." The formula is then taken up, purified of every ideological reading and integrated into the universal magisterium by John Paul II, notably in Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (1987).

    23
  22. Saint John Paul II, Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, 30 December 1987, no. 42: "This is an option, or a special form of priority in the exercise of the Christian charity, to which the whole tradition of the Church bears witness." Official French text, vatican.va.

    24
  23. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2448: "human misery […] attracted the compassion of Christ the Saviour who undertook it and identified himself with the 'least of his brethren.' That is why those crushed by it are the object of a preferential love on the part of the Church."

    25
  24. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2445: "Love for the poor is incompatible with immoderate love of riches or their selfish use," quoting Jas 5:1-6.

    26
  25. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2004, no. 182: "The principle of the universal destination of goods requires a particular solicitude for the poor, for those in conditions of marginality and, in any case, for the people whose living conditions prevent appropriate growth."

    27
  26. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, nos. 182-184: the preferential option or love for the poor is confirmed in no. 182 as a "special form of priority" in the exercise of Christian charity; the following numbers develop its concrete scope, which concerns the life of every Christian and extends to the many forms of poverty, material and new (solitude, marginality, deprivation of meaning).

    28
  27. Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, no. 48: "Today and always, 'the poor are the privileged recipients of the Gospel'"; "there is an inseparable bond between our faith and the poor. May we never abandon them."

    29
  28. Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, no. 198: "For the Church, the option for the poor is a theological category before it is cultural, sociological, political or philosophical. […] That is why I want a Church which is poor and for the poor. They have much to teach us." Official French text, vatican.va.

    30
  29. Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum, 15 May 1891, official French text (vatican.va): "The rich, sheltered as it were behind their wealth, have less need of public protection. The poor, on the contrary, with nothing to protect them against injustice, depend chiefly on the protection of the State. The State must therefore surround with special care and providence the workers who belong in general to the poor class."

    31
  30. Saint Paul VI, Octogesima Adveniens, apostolic letter of 14 May 1971 for the 80th anniversary of Rerum Novarum, no. 23, official French text (vatican.va): "The Gospel, by teaching us charity, teaches us privileged respect for the poor and their special situation in society." This text is recognized as one of the direct seeds of the later formula of the "preferential option for the poor."

    32
  31. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Libertatis Nuntius (Instruction on certain aspects of "liberation theology"), 6 August 1984, foreword, official French text (vatican.va): the Instruction targets "certain forms of liberation theology which have recourse, in an insufficiently critical manner, to concepts borrowed from various currents of Marxist thought." Completed by Libertatis Conscientia (Instruction on Christian freedom and liberation), 22 March 1986, which recognizes the legitimate concern for the poor while pursuing the warning against borrowing Marxist categories (class struggle erected into a law of history).

    33
  32. Saint John Paul II, Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, nos. 36-37: "structures of sin" are rooted in personal sin — the "exclusive desire for profit" and the "thirst for power" — and, once in place, "grow stronger, spread, and become the source of other sins, and so influence people's behaviour."

    35
  33. Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, no. 53: "The human being is considered as a consumer good, which can be used and then thrown away. We have launched the 'throwaway' culture."

    36
  34. Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, no. 198: "They have much to teach us. […] we are called to find Christ in them […] and also to welcome the mysterious wisdom which God wishes to communicate to us through them."

    37
  35. Jesus to Luisa Piccarreta, The Book of Heaven, vol. 36, 6 August 1938 (entry 36-23): "Thus, she who lives in Our Will does everything, embraces everyone and gives Us everything." French edition Lumen Luminis (private circulation), vol. 36, p. 115. See also, in the same sense, vol. 20, 23 September 1926: "That is why, in all that you do, I make you act for all, embrace all, make reparation in the name of all for their acts" (same edition, vol. 20, p. 13). These two passages are likewise relayed, in a slightly different translation, by Fr. Joseph L. Iannuzzi, The 70 Questions and Answers (French collection of the questions and answers published on ltdw.org, located by question): first passage at question 11, second passage at question 46, note 5.

    38